¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ

Our Research

We're a team of generative AI and legal veterans.
Our advisors include Professor Jun Wang, Lord Neuberger and other industry titans.

What our research covers

We have been studying the effects of generative AI on the legal industry since our company was founded in 2017. Here's a brief summary of what we've worked on:

â€

De-identification of Contracts (Collaboration with Barclays, Withers, the University of Oxford and Imperial College London)

UKRI awarded a £1.5M grant to ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ’s consortium - Barclays, Withers, the University of Oxford, and Imperial College London - to answer two of the biggest challenges to the adoption of AI in Legal services:

  • access to confidential data
  • understanding the decisions machine learning models make

The project aimed to answer these challenges with the combined capabilities of

  • ¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ’s Legal AI
  • Oxford University’s research into robust recurrent neural networks to explain the accuracy of machine learning decisions
  • Imperial College’s research into the de-identification of legal contracts to anonymise confidential data while retaining critical information.

â€

The State of Legal AI

You can for this published on December 12th 2024, or find one of the 92 sections which interests you most using the links below.

Full list of sections

  1. The 2024 Legal AI Retrospective:
Key Lessons from the Past Year
  2. Current state of Legal AI
  3. Brief history of AI in the legal sector
  4. Key Challenges and 2025 Outlook
  5. Key Areas of Legal AI Development
  6. Legal Chatbots and Client Engagement
  7. Key Applications of Legal AI
  8. Document review and contract analysis
  9. AI-Driven Legal Research and Knowledge Management
  10. AI in Due diligence and compliance
  11. Natural Language Processing in Legal Text Analysis
  12. AI in Contract Analysis
  13. AI-Enhanced Risk Assessment and Management
  14. Automated Regulatory Compliance Monitoring
  15. AI in Summarizing Legislation
  16. AI for Reacting to Legislative Changes
  17. AI for Data Privacy and Security Compliance
  18. Automated Due Diligence Reporting
  19. Automated trademark infringement monitoring
  20. AI-Assisted Legal Communications Drafting
  21. AI in Legal and contract drafting
  22. AI-Assisted Document Drafting
  23. Open Access and Open source Legal AI
  24. AI Contract Generators
  25. Multilingual Contract Drafting with AI
  26. AI-enhanced Contextual Clause Suggestions
  27. AI in Data Governance for Legal
  28. Changing of the guard
  29. Emerging Legal Editors and Drafting Tools
  30. Compliance Decisions
  31. IP Risk Assessment in Data Flows
  32. Data Usage Throughout the Legal Value Chain
  33. Multimodal AI Models for Legal
  34. Ethical AI and Bias Mitigation in Legal
  35. Large Language Models in Legal AI
  36. Multilingual NLP for Legal AI
  37. Efficient Training and Deployment of Legal AI
  38. Explainable AI in Legal Decision-Making
  39. Creating Explanations for New Types of Legal AI
  40. Evaluating XAI Methods in Legal AI
  41. Transformer Architecture Dominance in Legal NLP
  42. Supporting Multi-Dimensional Explainability in Legal AI
  43. Supporting Human-Centered Explanations in Legal AI
  44. Adjusting XAI Methods for Different Legal Contexts
  45. Mitigating Negative Impacts of XAI in Legal
  46. Improving Societal Impact of Legal XAI
  47. AI-Enhanced Contract Drafting, Review, and Analysis
  48. Contract Law and Democratizing of Market Standards
  49. Standardization of Contract Terms and Clauses with AI
  50. Available Legal AI Datasets
  51. Improving Current XAI Methods for Legal AI
  52. Emerging Trends and Technologies
  53. Defining Accuracy in Legal AI
  54. Challenges to the adoption of AI in contract law
  55. Prompt Engineering for Legal AI
  56. Advantages of Legal AI for In-house Teams
  57. Increased Efficiency: Time Savings for In-house Legal
  58. AI Becomes an In-house Alternative Legal Service Provider
  59. Increased Accuracy: More Data-driven Decisions In-house
  60. In-house Legal Teams: The Frontier of Legal AI Innovation
  61. AI Empowering Strategic Risk Management In-house
  62. Junior In-house Legal Roles Evolve into "AI Wranglers"
  63. Data Privacy and Security Concerns with Legal AI In-house
  64. Concerns and Limitations of Legal AI for In-house Teams
  65. Potential for Bias and Errors in Legal AI In-house
  66. Ethical Considerations and Accountability of Legal AI In-house
  67. AI Hallucinations and Reliability Issues In-house
  68. Advantages of Legal AI for Biglaw Firms
  69. Enhanced Client Value Through AI-Driven Productization at Biglaw
  70. Balancing Legal AI Adoption with Caution In-house
  71. Potential for Higher Margins and Competitive Advantage with AI at Biglaw
  72. AI Customization and Localization Opportunities for Biglaw
  73. In-House Development of Specialized AI Applications at Biglaw
  74. Ethical Implications of AI and Time Tracking at Biglaw
  75. Concerns and Limitations of Legal AI for Biglaw Firms
  76. Data Security and Client Confidentiality Concerns with Legal AI at Biglaw
  77. AI Enabling Product-Led Growth and Democratization of Legal Services at Biglaw
  78. Accuracy and Reliability of AI-Generated Legal Content at Biglaw
  79. AI Hallucinations and False Information in Legal AI at Biglaw
  80. Over Reliance on AI and Skill Atrophy at Biglaw
  81. Cultural Resistance and Shadow AI Usage at Biglaw
  82. Advantages of Legal AI for Small Law Firms and Sole Practitioners
  83. AI Enabling Expansion into New Practice Areas for Small Law Firms
  84. Enhanced Research Capabilities with AI for Small Law Firms
  85. Customized Document Generation with AI for Small Law Firms
  86. AI as Cost-Effective Alternative to Additional Staff for Small Law Firms
  87. Increased Productivity and Client Capacity with AI for Small Law Firms
  88. Concerns and Limitations of Legal AI for Small Law Firms and Sole Practitioners
  89. Limited AI Customization for Niche Practice Areas at Small Law Firms
  90. High Initial Costs and Implementation Challenges of AI for Small Law Firms
  91. Client Perception and Trust Issues with AI at Small Law Firms
  92. Industry-wide challenges

â€

â€Comparisons of Legal AI tools

We haven't published these yet, but we've carried out detailed analysis on the market for Legal AI tools. We researched 80+ legaltech tools claiming to offer AI services, and compare them side-by-side.

â€

Much more to come

4 years before the world had it's ChatGPT moment, our Co-founder and CEO, Rafie Faruq was writing his thesis on Generative AI. A lot has changed since then, and we have a lot of unpublished research on effective prompting of Legal AI, anonymisation, document transformation, AI negotiation, and much more.

We apply first-principles thinking within our Senior Machine Learning team here, tied to our relentless pursuit of delivering value to our customers.

Use the links below to follow us on our social channels to stay informed on new research and developments.
â€

For future research releases, follow , , and .

â€
Contact us if you'd like more information on any of the research mentioned on this page. community@genieai.co (Alex Denne)