¶¶Òõ¶ÌÊÓƵ

A Due Diligence Policy sets clear rules and steps for investigating potential business partners, investments, or acquisitions before making major decisions. It helps companies avoid legal troubles, financial risks, and reputation damage by requiring thorough research into areas like financial health, legal compliance, and operational practices.

These policies typically outline specific checks required under U.S. securities laws, anti-money laundering regulations, and industry standards. Organizations use them to create consistent investigation processes, document their findings, and prove they took reasonable steps to prevent problems - which can provide important legal protection if issues arise later.

Put a Due Diligence Policy in place before entering any major business deals, especially mergers, acquisitions, or significant investments. It's essential when exploring new partnerships, expanding into unfamiliar markets, or working with international vendors where U.S. compliance requirements come into play.

The policy becomes particularly crucial during time-sensitive deals where thorough vetting could reveal hidden liabilities or compliance issues. Having it ready before starting negotiations helps your team move quickly while still protecting against risks like FCPA violations, undisclosed debts, or intellectual property disputes that might only surface after closing.

• Transactional Due Diligence Policy: Focuses on merger and acquisition investigations, including financial records, contracts, and market position analysis
• Vendor Due Diligence Policy: Covers supplier vetting, third-party risk assessments, and supply chain compliance checks
• Investment Due Diligence Policy: Details procedures for evaluating potential investments, securities offerings, and fund management
• Compliance Due Diligence Policy: Emphasizes regulatory requirements, anti-corruption measures, and sanctions screening
• Environmental and Social Due Diligence Policy: Addresses ESG factors, sustainability compliance, and social impact evaluation

• Corporate Legal Teams: Draft and maintain the policy, ensuring it meets SEC requirements and industry standards
• C-Suite Executives: Review and approve policy requirements, oversee implementation across departments
• Compliance Officers: Manage day-to-day policy execution, coordinate investigations, and document findings
• Investment Teams: Follow policy guidelines when evaluating potential deals or partnerships
• External Advisors: Assist with specialized reviews like financial audits, legal compliance, or technical assessments
• Board Members: Monitor policy effectiveness and ensure proper risk management oversight

• Identify Scope: Define which business activities and transactions require due diligence review
• Risk Assessment: Map out key risks specific to your industry, market position, and regulatory obligations
• Process Timeline: Establish clear deadlines and review periods for each type of investigation
• Team Roles: Assign responsibilities for conducting reviews, approvals, and documentation
• Compliance Requirements: List applicable U.S. regulations, industry standards, and reporting obligations
• Documentation Standards: Create templates for recording findings, red flags, and final recommendations
• Review Mechanisms: Set up regular policy updates and effectiveness assessments

• Purpose Statement: Clear objectives and scope of due diligence activities
• Review Procedures: Detailed steps for conducting investigations across different transaction types
• Risk Categories: Specific areas requiring examination (financial, legal, operational, regulatory)
• Reporting Requirements: Documentation standards and internal communication protocols
• Authority Levels: Decision-making hierarchy and approval thresholds
• Compliance Standards: References to relevant U.S. laws and regulatory requirements
• Record Retention: Guidelines for maintaining investigation records and findings
• Policy Updates: Process for regular review and amendment procedures

A Due Diligence Policy differs significantly from a Due Diligence Checklist in both scope and function. While they work together, each serves a distinct purpose in the investigation process.

• Framework vs. Tool: The policy establishes the overall strategy and requirements for conducting investigations, while the checklist is a tactical tool listing specific items to verify
• Permanence: Policies remain relatively stable and require formal updates, whereas checklists are frequently customized for specific transactions
• Authority Level: Policies need executive approval and set binding requirements, while checklists serve as operational guides without independent authority
• Scope of Use: Policies govern all due diligence activities across the organization, but checklists target specific transaction types or investigation areas
• Legal Weight: The policy demonstrates systematic risk management practices to regulators, while checklists primarily document completion of required steps