��������Ƶ

An Enterprise Risk Management Framework helps organizations in Singapore systematically identify, assess, and handle potential threats to their business. It sets clear guidelines for managing risks across all departments - from financial and operational risks to compliance with MAS regulations and the Companies Act.

The framework gives companies a structured way to protect themselves while pursuing growth opportunities. It typically includes risk appetite statements, control procedures, and reporting mechanisms that help boards and management teams make better decisions. Singapore-listed companies must follow specific risk management requirements, making this framework essential for good corporate governance.

Companies need an Enterprise Risk Management Framework when expanding operations, entering new markets, or facing increased regulatory scrutiny in Singapore. It's particularly crucial for financial institutions meeting MAS guidelines, listed companies complying with SGX requirements, and organizations managing complex supply chains or cybersecurity threats.

The framework becomes essential during major organizational changes, like mergers and acquisitions, new product launches, or digital transformations. It helps boards and management teams spot potential issues early, make informed decisions about risk tolerance, and maintain strong governance standards. Many companies implement it before annual audits or when preparing for regulatory inspections.

• Basic frameworks focus on core risk categories like financial, operational, and compliance risks - ideal for SMEs and startups in Singapore.
• Comprehensive frameworks add detailed sections on technology risks, third-party relationships, and environmental impacts - commonly used by listed companies and financial institutions.
• Industry-specific frameworks customize risk categories for sectors like manufacturing, healthcare, or fintech - aligning with specific MAS guidelines and sector regulations.
• Global-local hybrid frameworks balance international standards with Singapore's regulatory requirements - popular among multinational corporations operating locally.

• Board of Directors: Approves and oversees the Enterprise Risk Management Framework, sets risk appetite, and ensures alignment with business strategy
• Risk Management Committee: Develops and maintains the framework, monitors its effectiveness, and reports to the board on risk issues
• Department Heads: Implement risk controls within their units and provide regular updates on risk status and mitigation efforts
• Compliance Officers: Ensure the framework meets MAS guidelines and other regulatory requirements
• Internal Auditors: Review and test the framework's effectiveness, providing independent assurance to management

• Risk Assessment: Map out your organization's key risks across operations, finance, compliance, and technology
• Stakeholder Input: Gather insights from department heads about specific risks and controls in their areas
• Regulatory Review: Check current MAS guidelines and SGX requirements applicable to your industry
• Control Documentation: List existing risk management processes and identify gaps needing attention
• Framework Structure: Define risk appetite, reporting lines, and escalation procedures clearly
• Implementation Plan: Create a timeline for rolling out the framework, including staff training and monitoring systems

• Risk Governance Structure: Clear outline of board and management responsibilities aligned with MAS guidelines
• Risk Appetite Statement: Specific risk tolerance levels and limits for different business activities
• Risk Assessment Process: Methodology for identifying, measuring, and prioritizing risks
• Control Mechanisms: Detailed procedures for risk mitigation and internal controls
• Reporting Framework: Schedule and format of risk reports to management and board
• Review Procedures: Process for regular framework evaluation and updates
• Compliance Requirements: References to relevant Singapore regulations and industry standards

An Enterprise Risk Management Framework is often confused with a Risk Management Policy, but they serve different purposes in Singapore's regulatory landscape. While both deal with organizational risks, their scope and implementation differ significantly.

• Scope and Structure: The framework provides the overarching system for managing all risks across an organization, while a policy focuses on specific rules and procedures for handling individual risks
• Regulatory Compliance: The framework aligns with MAS Guidelines on Risk Management and corporate governance requirements, whereas policies typically address operational-level compliance
• Implementation Level: Frameworks operate at a strategic level, setting organization-wide standards and processes; policies work at tactical levels with specific actions and responsibilities
• Review Cycle: Frameworks undergo comprehensive reviews annually or during major organizational changes, while policies may be updated more frequently based on operational needs