��������Ƶ

A Tolling Agreement pauses the countdown on Singapore's legal time limits for filing lawsuits, giving parties more time to resolve disputes without rushing to court. It's commonly used when potential litigants want to negotiate or gather evidence before deciding to sue, especially in complex commercial disputes or construction claims.

These agreements help businesses save costs and maintain relationships by creating breathing room for settlement talks. Under Singapore's Limitation Act, most civil claims must be filed within 6 years, but a properly drafted Tolling Agreement lets parties extend this deadline while they work toward an amicable solution. Companies often pair these with standstill provisions to freeze any legal actions during negotiations.

Consider a Tolling Agreement when you need more time to investigate potential claims without losing your right to sue under Singapore's limitation periods. This proves especially valuable in complex construction disputes, professional negligence cases, or when uncovering financial irregularities requires extensive documentation and expert analysis.

The agreement becomes crucial when negotiations are progressing but time is running short on your legal deadline. It's particularly useful for multi-party disputes where relationships matter, giving everyone breathing room to work through issues without the pressure of imminent court action. Many Singapore companies use it during ongoing business relationships to maintain commercial ties while resolving differences.

• Basic Time Extension: The simplest form of Tolling Agreement that just stops the limitation clock, commonly used in straightforward commercial disputes
• Standstill Plus Tolling: Combines time extension with a promise not to take legal action, popular in ongoing business relationships
• Conditional Tolling: Links the time extension to specific requirements like information sharing or mediation attempts
• Multi-Party Tolling: Specially structured for complex disputes involving multiple parties, common in construction and development projects
• Limited Scope Tolling: Restricts the agreement to specific claims or issues while preserving limitation periods for others

• Corporate Legal Teams: Draft and review Tolling Agreements to protect their companies' interests during dispute negotiations
• Construction Companies: Commonly use these agreements in complex project disputes to maintain working relationships while resolving issues
• External Law Firms: Advise on agreement terms and ensure compliance with Singapore's limitation laws
• Business Executives: Authorize and sign these agreements as part of strategic dispute management
• Professional Services Firms: Enter into these agreements when facing potential negligence claims from clients
• Insurance Companies: Use tolling provisions while investigating complex claims or negotiating settlements

• Identify Claims: List all potential legal claims and their current limitation deadlines under Singapore law
• Gather Documentation: Collect relevant contracts, correspondence, and evidence related to the dispute
• Define Scope: Specify which claims the tolling period will cover and for how long
• Party Details: Confirm correct legal names and authority of signatories for all involved parties
• Extension Period: Calculate and clearly state the new deadline for filing claims
• Standstill Terms: Outline any additional agreements about pausing legal actions during negotiations
• Review Process: Use our platform to generate a legally sound agreement that includes all required elements

• Parties Section: Full legal names and registration details of all involved entities
• Claims Definition: Precise description of which claims or disputes are covered by the agreement
• Tolling Period: Clear start and end dates for the limitation period extension
• Calculation Method: Formula showing how the new deadline is determined
• Preservation Clause: Statement that all legal rights remain intact during the tolling period
• Governing Law: Explicit reference to Singapore law and jurisdiction
• Termination Terms: Conditions for ending the agreement early
• Execution Block: Proper signature sections for authorized representatives

A Tolling Agreement differs significantly from an Arbitration Agreement in how they manage dispute resolution timelines. While both documents help parties handle conflicts, they serve distinct purposes in Singapore's legal framework.

• Purpose and Timing: Tolling Agreements pause the statute of limitations to allow negotiation time, while Arbitration Agreements commit parties to resolve disputes through arbitration instead of court litigation
• Legal Effect: A Tolling Agreement preserves existing legal rights without changing the dispute resolution method, whereas an Arbitration Agreement permanently alters how disputes must be resolved
• Flexibility: Tolling Agreements are temporary and can be terminated, while Arbitration Agreements typically create permanent binding obligations
• Cost Implications: Tolling Agreements mainly involve negotiation costs, but Arbitration Agreements commit parties to potentially significant arbitration expenses