��������Ƶ

An Expert Determination Agreement establishes a binding process where an independent expert resolves specific technical, financial, or professional disputes outside of court. Under Swiss law, this approach offers a faster, more specialized alternative to traditional litigation or arbitration, particularly for complex issues requiring deep subject matter expertise.

These agreements spell out the expert's scope, selection process, and the binding nature of their decision. They're especially common in Swiss construction projects, M&A transactions, and intellectual property valuations where precise technical knowledge makes more sense than general legal proceedings. The expert's determination becomes final unless there are serious procedural flaws or clear mistakes in applying Swiss law.

Expert Determination Agreements work best when you need quick, specialized decisions on technical disputes in Switzerland. They're particularly valuable for complex engineering disagreements, intellectual property valuations, or detailed financial matters where standard courts might lack the specific expertise needed to make informed judgments.

Consider using this approach during major construction projects, when pricing earn-out clauses in M&A deals, or resolving technical patent disputes. The process saves significant time and money compared to litigation, while ensuring decisions come from someone who truly understands the technical complexities. Swiss courts generally respect these determinations, making them an efficient choice for specialized conflicts.

• Basic Technical Determination: Standard form focusing on single technical issues, often used in construction or engineering disputes with one clear question for the expert
• Multi-Expert Panel Agreement: Involves multiple experts for complex disputes requiring different technical specialties, common in large infrastructure projects
• Valuation-Specific Agreement: Tailored for financial valuations in M&A transactions or company disputes, with detailed methodology requirements
• Industry-Specific Format: Customized for particular sectors like pharma or technology, incorporating relevant technical standards and industry practices
• Preliminary Assessment Version: Allows for initial non-binding expert opinion before committing to final determination, popular in Swiss commercial disputes

• Disputing Parties: Companies, organizations, or individuals who agree to submit their technical or commercial disputes to expert determination
• Technical Experts: Qualified professionals with specific industry expertise who evaluate evidence and make binding determinations
• Legal Counsel: Swiss attorneys who draft the agreements and ensure compliance with local law while protecting their clients' interests
• Industry Specialists: Subject matter experts who help define technical parameters and evaluation criteria
• Corporate Executives: Decision-makers who authorize the use of expert determination and commit their organizations to the process

• Scope Definition: Clearly outline the specific technical issues or disputes the expert will determine
• Expert Qualifications: Define required expertise, professional credentials, and independence criteria
• Process Details: Document submission rules, timelines, and communication protocols between parties
• Decision Parameters: Specify how the expert should reach and present their determination
• Contractual Elements: Include Swiss law compliance requirements, confidentiality terms, and cost allocation
• Enforcement Mechanics: Detail the binding nature of the determination and any appeal limitations
• Documentation Review: Our platform ensures all these elements are properly structured and legally sound

• Party Identification: Full legal names and addresses of all involved parties and the chosen expert
• Scope Definition: Precise description of technical issues to be determined and expert's mandate
• Expert Powers: Clear outline of authority, decision-making parameters, and procedural rules
• Timeline Provisions: Specific deadlines for submissions, expert review, and final determination
• Confidentiality Terms: Rules governing information handling and disclosure restrictions
• Cost Allocation: Clear breakdown of expert fees and expense distribution between parties
• Governing Law: Express choice of Swiss law and jurisdiction provisions
• Binding Effect: Statement confirming the determination's final and binding nature

Expert Determination Agreements differ significantly from Conciliation Agreements, though both aim to resolve disputes outside traditional court proceedings. The key distinction lies in their approach and outcome structure.

• Decision-Making Authority: Expert determination relies on a technical specialist making binding decisions based on specific expertise, while conciliation involves a mediator who helps parties reach their own solution
• Scope of Issues: Expert determination typically addresses narrow technical or valuation questions, whereas conciliation can handle broader relationship and business conflicts
• Outcome Binding Nature: Expert decisions are usually final and binding immediately, while conciliation outcomes require mutual agreement to become binding
• Process Structure: Expert determination follows a more formal, evidence-based evaluation process, while conciliation emphasizes flexible dialogue and negotiation